Foodconsumer.org


All News 
 
 Misc. News
 F.eatured P.roducts
 R.ecalls & A.lerts
 C.onsumer A.ffair
 Non-f.ood Things
 L.etter to E.ditor
 H.ealth T.ips
 Interesting Sites
 
 D.iet & H.ealth
 H.eart & B.lood
 C.ancer
 B.ody W.eight
 C.hildren & W.omen
 G.eneral H.ealth
 N.utrition
 
 F.ood & H.ealth
 F.ood C.hemicals
 B.iological A.gents
 C.ooking & P.acking
 T.echnologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 L.aws & P.olitics
 
 F.ood C.onsumer
 FC News & Others
Search


Newsfeed foodconsumer.org news feed

FC InsiderNews



Submit news[release]
PT writers wanted



Sponsors' link
profood - food ingredients supplier
shopseek shop dir.
infoplus web dir.

Misc. News : Non-f.ood Things Last Updated: Dec 6th, 2006 - 21:21:56


Report says CT scans exposed youngsters to levels equivalent to 4,000 X-rays
By
Dec 6, 2006, 21:03

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
Report says CT scans exposed youngsters to levels equivalent to 4,000 X-rays

KAREN HOWLETT AND GREG MCARTHUR

TORONTO -- Children in Ontario undergoing CT scans have been unwittingly subjected to radiation doses equivalent to more than 4,000 X-rays, levels high enough to raise cancer fears, the province's Auditor-General says.

In his sweeping annual report yesterday, Jim McCarter said doctors have underestimated the effects of certain diagnostic imaging tests on patients, especially children, and have exposed them to levels of radiation that are believed to cause cancer.


Read more

Editor's note: By all means everyone should try hard enough to avoid getting x-ray imaging. At least, X-ray imaging should not be done just to quench doctors’ curiosity. One of the risks you may never know is that radiologists seldom measure the dose, according to Dr John Gofman, a noted physicist and physician, who found 75 percent of breast cancer cases is linked to medical x-ray exposure. He said the dose for a single x-ray can vary by a factor of ten because radiologists never measure the dose. Some reports said 30 percent of x-ray exposure is unneccessary, meaningless or senseless.




© 2004-2005 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page







Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org
Disclaimer | Advertising | Jobs | Privacy | About US | FC InsiderNews
© 2004-2006 foodconsumer.org™ all rights reserved
Get newsFeed on your site.