Foodconsumer.org

 
USCards.com Bookmark Us
All Food, Diet and Health News 
 
 Misc. News
 Must-Read News
 Letter to Editor
 Featured Products
 Recalls & Alerts
 Consumer Affair
 Non-food Things
 Health Tips
 Interesting Sites
 
 Diet & Health
 Heart & Blood
 Cancer
 Body Weight
 Children & Women
 General Health
 Nutrition
 
 Food & Health
 Food Chemicals
 Biological Agents
 Cooking & Packing
 Technologies
 Agri. & Environ.
 Laws & Politics
 
 General Health
 Drug News
 Diseases
 Mental Health
 Infectious Disease
 Environment
 Lifestyle
 Government
 Other News
 
 Food Consumer
 FC News & Others
Search





Search Foodconsumer & Others


Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo
Newsfeed

foodconsumer.org news feed
Su bmit news[release]



More than 100 credit cards available at uscards.com from uscards.com, you can pick more than 100 credit cards


General Health : Drug News Last Updated: Apr 20, 2011 - 9:38:09 AM


Some HIV drugs raise risk of heart attack
By Sue Mueller
Apr 2, 2008 - 10:14:28 AM

E.mail t.his a.rticle
 P.rinter f.riendly p.age
Get n.ewsletter
 
   
WEDNESDAY April 2, 2008 (Foodconsumer.org) -- Two common HIV drugs, abacavir and didanosine, seem to increase the risk of heart attacks, according to a new study released Wednesday in the online edition of The Lancet.

In response, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last week it was now reviewing the safety of both drugs, healthday.com reported.

Patients with HIV often take a combination of medications including a protease inhibitor and a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor such as abacavir or didanosine.

The study found in people with underlying risk for heart attack, using either abacavir or didanosine will increase the risk by 38 percent although those who did not have underlying risk for heart attack will have a smaller increase in the risk.

In the study, Dr. Jens D. Lundgren of the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and colleagues looked at data on 33,347 HIV patients and found the connection between HIV medications and heart attack.

They found commonly used nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors such as  zidovudine, stavudine or lamivudine were not associated with increased risk for heart attack.

But abacavir and didanosine, two other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, were associated with an increased rate of heart attack, the researchers found.

Those who took abacavir were twice as likely to experience heart attack as those who did not take the drug.  For those who took didanosine, the risk was increased by 50 percent.

It took about six months to eliminate the increased risk of heart attack after the patients who stopped using these drugs, the researchers said.

Lundgren recommended those who have underlying cardiovascular risk should consider using safer alternatives.

GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of abacavir, claimed in a letter published in the same issue of the journal that the company analyzed 54 studies and found no such association between the risk of heart attack and the drug.

Didanosine is made by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The FDA said that a safety review of both drugs was underway.

"FDA continues to evaluate the overall risks and benefits of abacavir and didanosine. This evaluation may result in the need to revise labeling for the products," the agency was cited as saying in a statement.

"Until this evaluation is complete, health-care providers should evaluate the potential risks and benefits of each HIV-1 antiretroviral drug their patients are taking, including abacavir and didanosine," the FDA said.




© 2004-2008 by foodconsumer.org unless otherwise specified

Top of Page




Google
 
Web foodconsumer.org

Search Consumer-friendly Health Sites












We have moved to Food Consumer . Org



disclaimer | advertising | jobs | privacy | about us | newsletter | Submit news/articles
link partners: | Buy Viagra | MarketAmerica.com |
Buy a home | Auto Insurance | Mortgage refinancing | DaytonaCPA.com | Take Your Blog to a Higher Level
© Copyright 2004 - 2008 foodconsumer.org All rights reserved

Disclaimer: What's published on this website should be considered opinions of respective writers only and foodconsumer.org which has no political agenda nor commercial ambition may or may not endorse any opinion of any writer. No accuracy is guaranteed although writers are doing their best to provide accurate information only. The information on this website should not be construed as medical advice and should not be used to replace professional services provided by qualified or licensed health care workers. The site serves only as a platform for writers and readers to share knowledge, experience, and information from the scientific community, organizations, government agencies and individuals. Foodconsumer.org encourages readers who have had medical conditions to consult with licensed health care providers - conventional and or alternative medical practitioners.