Home | Avoiding Illness | Cancer | Pancreatic cancer, linked to dietary habits, grows slowly - studies

Pancreatic cancer, linked to dietary habits, grows slowly - studies

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

A new study in the October 28, 2010 issue of the journal Nature suggests that the growth of pancreatic cancer is a slow process and it takes almost 20 years for the disease to develop from a pancreatic cancer cell to a tumor, which spreads to other organs (metastasis) and eventually kills a patient in a couple of years.

Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of pathology and oncology at Hopkins' Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center and colleagues studied genetic mutations using genetic material collected from pancreatic cancer patients who died from the disease and determined the timing of the carcinogenesis.

Based on sophisticated mathematical models, they found it takes an average of 11.7 years for the first cancer cell to develop within a high grade pancreatic lesion, and then another 6.8 years for the cancer to grow and for at least another cancer cell to potentially spread and finally an average of 2.7 years for the disease to kill a patient.

Pancreatic cancer is so dangerous that 95 percent of patients who are diagnosed with the disease die within five years of diagnosis because the cancer is hard to be found early enough to be treated.

Iacobuzio-Donahue's study was to find a screening method to help detect pancreatic cancer at a time the disease is still treatable.

Bert Vogelstein, M.D., at the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics & Therapeutics at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center said the study results show "many pancreatic cancer cases have a long lag time before they are detected through conventional tests. This leaves room to develop new early, diagnostic tools and intervene with potentially curative surgery."

Although pancreatic cancer is dangerous, the risk for a person to acquire the disease may be reduced by following a healthy lifestyle.  Quite some research conducted suggests that dietary habits were linked to pancreatic cancer.

Fruit and vegetables cut the risk while meat, sugar and high GI diet boosts the risk

A study published in Nov 2009 in Cancer Causes and Control suggests eating meat may increase risk of pancreatic cancer while eating fruit and vegetables may reduce the risk.

The case-control study led by Jerry Polesel at Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS in Aviano, Italy and colleagues showed those who frequently consumed meat were twice as likely to develop pancreatic cancer.

Polesel et al. analysed data on dietary habits of 326 patients with pancreatic cancer aged 63 on average and 652 controls at the same age and found the association.

They found meat cooked by boiling, stewing or broiling or roasting was also significantly associated with the risk.

Additionally, use of added table sugar and potatoes were also associated with about 100 percent increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

It is unknown why meat, sugar and potatoes were linked with increased risk of pancreatic cancer. One thing for sure is that cooked potatoes like fries and roasted or grilled meat, particularly red meat contain carcinogens. Sugar can boost the production of insulin-like growth hormone, which is known to promote cancer growth.

On the other hand, the authors of the study found non-citrus fruits, cooked vegetables and pulses may potentially reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer by 59 percent, 43 percent and 41 percent respectively.

Polesel et al concluded "The present study supports an inverse association between fruits and vegetables and pancreatic cancer risk, and it confirms a direct relation with meat. The increased risk for table sugar suggests that insulin resistance may play a role in pancreatic carcinogenesis."

Another study by researchers including Jerry Polesel at Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri,” Milan, Italy also came to the same conclusion.

Marta Rossi SCD. and colleagues used the data set from the patients and controls and found glycemic index, but not glycemic load was associated with pancreatic cancer.

The researchers found a diet with highest glycemic index, which means the diet releases glucose at a fastest speed was linked with up to 78 percent increased risk of pancreatic cancer, compared to a diet with the lowest glycemic index.

Consumption of sugar, candy, honey, and jam was positively associated with the cancer while consumption of fruit was inversely associated.

The findings were reported in the June 2010 issue of Annals of Epidemiology.

Again based on data from the same study subjects and controls, Poelsel and colleagues found the highest quintile of intake of vitamin E, vitamin C and potassium were associated with 40 percent, 56 percent and 44 percent reduced risk of pancreatic cancer compared to the lowest quintle of intake.

The findings were published in April 2010 in Annals of Oncology.

It should be noted that the associations does not mean taking vitamin E, vitamin C and potassium supplements may definitely help reduce the risk even though the possibility can't be excluded either. These nutrients are present largely in plant foods.

By David Liu

 

(Send your news to foodconsumer.org@gmail.com, Foodconsumer.org is part of the Infoplus.com ™ news and information network)

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (18 posted):

Paul Doering on 10/28/2010 12:41:37
avatar
"They found meat cooled by boiling, stewing or broiling or roasting was also significantly associated with the risk."

You meant "cooking", not "cooling", right?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Robert on 10/28/2010 12:52:57
avatar
It makes sense to think "cooked" not "cooled".
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Loretta on 10/28/2010 13:02:39
avatar
What are pulses?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Raynman on 10/28/2010 13:35:26
avatar
I read that article - it started out OK but the more I read the more puzzled I became...seems like a sham to me.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
slongo on 10/28/2010 13:49:42
avatar
pulses are like legumes and stuff; dried beans, etc
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
ernie on 10/28/2010 13:52:23
avatar
the fact that it is slow growing, and that there is research associated with early detection is the important message here. the balance of the article on risk factors seems speculative - more confusing than informative.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
JR in WV on 10/28/2010 13:52:26
avatar
pulses are beans and lentils, dry seeds cooked by boiling before eating. Chickpeas, lima beans, etc.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Jimbo on 10/28/2010 13:54:19
avatar
Glad some other people found the writing in this article jarring.

"releases glucose at a fastest speed" it's "the fastest speed" or "a faster speed". "a fastest speed" can't be correct.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Stanlish on 10/28/2010 14:02:28
avatar
Meat cooked by 'boiling, stewing or broiling or roasting'....what methods does this leave us with?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Misty Lou on 10/28/2010 14:16:31
avatar
Could have been written better.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
JS on 10/28/2010 14:38:10
avatar
@Loretta --
Pulses are beans eaten without the wrapper, like lentils or chickpeas (and not like green beans or edamame, which count as vegetables because you leave the seed pod on).
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_(legume) .
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Dan Andrews on 10/28/2010 15:09:03
avatar
Raw meat is OK?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Oviola on 10/28/2010 15:52:46
avatar
In spite of all the presented materials are interesting and further resesaches are needed
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Laura on 10/28/2010 16:49:04
avatar
I've heard it all before. When my father was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, the Dr. said it was a direct result of his drinking and smoking cigarettes. Then a year later my mother was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer ... that through the smoking and drinking theory out the window, my mother did not drink or smoke and had been divorced from my dad for over 15 years.
They do not know what causes it, they are blowing in the wind with their stupid theories.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Janet Vinyard on 10/29/2010 00:16:11
avatar
Laura, I was particularly interested in your comments because I lost both of my parents to pancreatic cancer also. My Dad was a drinker and a diabetic; died in 2001. My mother was neither a diabetic nor a drinker and she died in 2006. I keep wondering if it was something environmental in their home or area where they lived. Also of interest was the fact that there is no history of cancer of any kind on either side of the family. I'm sorry for your loss and glad to have read your comments as I haven't met or talked with anyone else who lost both parents to this wicked cancer.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Sally Annas on 11/01/2010 12:19:57
avatar
It is so hard to understand this disease, especially when two parents die from this. Eating habits of two people living together seem to explain it better except that environmental exposure could also be the culprit.I am Janet's exsister in law. My parents in law both died from this horrible disease and they're missed terribly.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
JS on 11/01/2010 21:43:29
avatar
Laura and Janet, you also have me. Both of mine died of it too.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
NC on 02/14/2011 07:48:34
avatar
My father AND grandmother also died of it. So horrible that you all lost both of your parents. This also leads me to think environmental factors. Have any of you been involved in studies or talked to doctors about early detection check ups?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
Newsletter
Email:
Rate this article
3.74