Does Gardasil Actually Increase Your Risk of Cervical Cancer?
Posted By Dr. Mercola | July 20 2010
According to information the manufacturer of Gardasil, a vaccine against human papillomavirus, presented to the FDA prior to approval, if a person has already been exposed to HPV 16 or 18 prior to injection, then Gardasil increases the risk of precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6 percent.
This information is not advertised, and the FDA has not recommended screening for HPV prior to vaccination. The FDA did not even demand that a warning be included in the package insert.
According to Examiner.com:
"Now, Merck's research is indicating that Gardasil may also 'provide cross-protection' against other strains of HPV that are closely related to HPV 16 and 18 ... This means prior exposure to these additional strains may pose an increased risk for cervical cancer also, if combined with vaccination."
Sources:
Comments (1 posted):
Dr Angela Raffle, UK screening expert, published some amazing research in the BMJ in 2003, "1000 women need regular smears for 35 years to save ONE woman from cc" BUT one third of the 1% who get cervical cancer have had one or more recent NORMAL pap smears (false negatives) AND two yearly screening will send 77% of women for colposcopy and usually some form of biopsy. Some women will be left worse off - about 95% of all referrals are unnecessary and caused by false positives. You risk infertility, problems during pregnancy, miscarriages, pre-term delivery/premature babies (1 in 10 will have a continuing serious disability) and psych issues - the damage to the healthy cervix's of thousands of women all to find 0.65% of women.
The really shameful thing, these facts are hidden from women. NO women are giving informed consent to cancer screening - informed consent is a legal requirement of all cancer screening, not just tests for men.
Before screening started, few women worried about this uncommon cancer that occurred as often as mouth cancer, since screening the burden for this rare disease falls on all women who screen and the harm to healthy women is awful.(and unethical)
I have made an informed decision not to screen. (as a low risk woman)
If I were higher risk, my first concern would be protecting my cervix and health from false positives which are very common - 5 yearly testing from age 30 - 5 to 7 tests in total gives sound protection from this small threat of cancer but also minimizes the risk of false positives - although even this schedule sends somewhere between 30%-55% of women for colposcopy/biopsies in their lifetime.
This is a very unreliable test for a rare cancer which is a combination that would usually rule it out for mass screening.
Know the facts BEFORE you screen, once you get that false positive, it's hard to turn back.
Screening is of no benefit in women under 25 and causes huge numbers of false positives. There is lots of informative information at Dr Joel Sherman's medical privacy blog under women's privacy issues.
Statistics are taken from Dr Raffle's research and an article by Dr DeMay (pathologist) - both appear at Dr Sherman's site. (and many others)





del.icio.us
Digg

Gardasil Can INCREASE Your Risk of Precancerous Lesions, or Worse
What Do Experts Know that You Don't?
Facts You Need to Know about HPV Infection and Protection
A Healthy Way to Avoid HPV