Home | Non-food | Government | Smoking ban effective now in Michigan

Smoking ban effective now in Michigan

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

The Michigan smoking ban took effect Saturday May 1 2010, making the state the 38th state to enact a smoking free law.

The legislation that is supported by the public was signed into law by Gov. Jennifer Granholm more than four months ago. 

Health advocates had sought the ban for many years hoping that it can cut down on the health hazards of second hand smoke, which is believed to cause lung cancer and other health conditions.

The Dr. Ron Davis Smoke Free Air Law bans smoking in most Michigan workplaces and public buildings including restaurants, bars, shopping malls, bowling alleys, concert halls, arenas, museums, mechanic shops, health facilities, nursing homes, education facilities, and child care centers.

There are exemptions.  The law does not cover gaming floors at Detroit's three casinos, 20 casinos run by Indian tribes in the state and cigar bars and tobacco specialty shops that meet certain criteria, according to a report by the AP.

Health officials expected that it would take some time to enforce the health law as they said smoking is a social behaviour.

The law applies mostly to indoor areas but also to some outdoor areas such as a restaurant patio where employees are present and food and drink are served.

Some key points about the Michigan smoke free law

Under the new health law. smoking is now banned in most public places in the state. The law covers any workplace, any food service establishment, and public places including, but not limited to restaurants, bars, shopping malls, bowling alleys, concert halls, arenas, museums, mechanic shops, health facilities, nursing homes, education facilities and child care centers.

The Michigan legislature passed the law on Dec 10, 2009 and Gov. Granholm signed the bill into law on Dec 18, 2009.

The smoke free law specifies the minimum requirements for indoor workplaces and public places. That is, if the local regulation/ordinance is weaker, the state law has the final say.

A public place subject to the smoke ban means indoor areas owned or operated by a state or local governmental agency and used by the general public; indoor areas used by the general public and is an educational facility, a home for the aged, nursing home, hospice, hospital long term care unit, auditorium, arenas, theater, museum, concert halls, facility that us used for a performance or exhibit of the arts; working place.

The law does not cover home office, but does cover offices in a commercial work establishment.

Business operators should prohibit smoking in areas where is is not allowed.

For more information, read 

http://www.michigan.gov/smokefreelaw

JD

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (5 posted):

Mike Golden on 05/02/2010 15:36:28
avatar
Why does'nt our Government just go ahead and BAN breathing that way we will be protected from ALL secoundhand dangers we consume thru the air we require to survive,How bout alcohol I don't drink but I take the chance of getting killed by a damn drunk fool everytime I leave my yard in a vehicle. I could go on about the dangers I incounter by someones elses vices but what the this is AMERICA the land of the FREE right.(wrong)
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Thomas Laprade on 05/03/2010 03:39:50
avatar
An alternative to smoking bans


If the public was honestly and truthfully informed about the effects of second-hand smoke, there would be fewer no-smoking laws in this country.

There has never been a single study showing that exposure to the low levels of smoke found in bars and restaurants with decent modern ventilation and filtration systems kills or harms anyone.

As to the annoyance of smoking, a compromise between smokers and non-smokers can be reached, through setting a quality standard and the use of modern ventilation technology.

Air ventilation can easily create a comfortable environment that removes not just passive smoke, but also and especially the potentially serious contaminants that are independent from smoking.

Thomas Laprade
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Debbi on 06/13/2010 03:00:33
avatar
As a former smoker I didn't see anything wrong with the way things were. I am old enough to remember when you could smoke almost everywhere. As of late, the only public places left to smoke were restaurants and bars. I used to love a cigarette after a meal or with a drink. I am also angry that the casinos still have smoking in them. It just shows you that money talks.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Brenda Lago on 07/16/2010 00:43:51
avatar
As a smoker I resent the smoking ban, not only is our great state of MICHIGAN is a down spiral. You are taking away the rights of not only the individuals who smoke but also the small bar owners and eateries that depend on the smokers. The casinos in Detroit are not on FEDERAL land but they are exempt, you can defend you country lose family memebers and friends but you take away the rights of these individuals to smoke in a private and I say private club that you may have defended this country but now you have ne rights. The Federal govt and State govt are suing each other over trival bull crap but we no longer have rights. I would like to know when the last time our grat and stupid law makers have ever entered a VFW Eagles or etc. That would definelty be way beyond you because we as the people do not live up to your standards. We pay for our homes, cars, insurance and even lose jobs why do you care, you born with a silver spoon and ours was tin.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
louis vuitton discount on 10/26/2010 05:44:23
avatar
hello
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Newsletter
Email:
Tags

Rate this article
4.50