Health care reform bill and my current insurance
Here are some common questions about how the health care reform bill will affect those who have employer-sponsored health insurance. The answers are offered by the White House, but edited by foodconsumer.org to simplify the message.
The main message is that if you like it, you can keep your insurance plan and your doctors. But the bill can strengthen your plan and protect you from insurance company abuses.
Will my premiums or costs go up because of health care reform bill?
No.
According to the independent and non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, people who get insurance coverage through their employers today will likely see lower premiums.
The new law will lower the insurance rates by reducing administrative costs, increasing competition between insurance companies and creating a larger pool of insured Americans.
The bill will save you money because if without the new law, in ten years, health care spending for each employee at an average big company will be $28,530.
Will my coverage at work change?
No. If you like the health plan you have, you can keep it.
The health reform bill does not require you to change your coverage. What the bill does is strengthen the coverage you get at work by making it easier to understand and adding some clear rules to rein in the worst insurance company abuses.
Under the new law, the language explaining what’s in your plan need to be simple and clear so that you know your exact benefits or coverage.
Insurance companies are not allowed to place a lifetime limit on the amount of care they pay for. And in some cases insurance companies with excessive overhead costs are required to give you a rebate. And, if your adult children are living at home up to age 26 they can be covered under your family policy.
Will the government take my choice of doctor away?
No.
The health care reform bill does not interfere with the choice of doctors you have today. The new law does not require you to change the coverage you have at work today.
What does the new law require the insurance companies to do with all the confusing forms?
Health reform bill requires health plans to use clear and plain language on insurance forms so that you can easily understand what benefits and what doctors are covered in your plan. And, standardized forms will be used to reduce the confusing and overwhelming paperwork that all Americans have to confront today.
What consumer protections will I get this year?
Beginning in September 2010, insurers will be prohibited from placing lifetime limits on what they will pay for your medical care, and they can only apply restricted annual benefit limits. Insurers will no longer be able to arbitrarily cancel your insurance policy when you get sick, except in cases of fraud.
Insurance companies will be prohibited from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions. This applies to all new and existing employer plans.
Beginning in September 2010, all new group health plans must provide coverage for preventive services. Recommended prevention and vaccination services will be covered without any deductibles or copayments. Plans must also have a straightforward and independent appeals process so you can appeal decisions by your health insurance plan.
Beginning on January 1, 2011, insurance companies will be required to spend most of your premium dollars on your care, not on profits and overhead -- 80 percent in the group market and 75 percent in the individual market -- and rebate any excessive overhead to enrollees.
Similarly, starting in plan year 2011, insurance companies that jack up rates will have to disclose requested premium increases publicly. If that rate increase is found to be unreasonable, the insurer may be prohibited from competing for your business in the new state-based exchange that will begin operating in 2014.
I’m a parent, how will the health care reform bill affect coverage for my children?
You can get coverage for your child if he or she has a pre-existing condition, and adult children can stay on family policies until age 26.
Beginning in September 2010, it will be illegal for health insurance companies that cover children to deny coverage to your child based on a pre-existing condition. This applies to all new employer plans, new plans in the individual market, and existing employer plans.
Beginning in September 2010, insurers will be required to permit children to stay on family policies until age 26. This applies to all plans in the individual market, new employer plans, and existing employer plans, unless your adult child has an offer of coverage through his or her employer. This requirement will take effect the next time your plan comes up for renewal. Adult children who are on their parents’ plan now but who lose that coverage when they graduate from college will have the option of rejoining their parents’ policy in the new plan year beginning n September 2010. Those whose parents work at self-insured companies will also be eligible if they do not have an offer of employer-sponsored insurance. Both married and unmarried dependents qualify for this dependent coverage. Beginning in 2014, children up to age 26 can stay on their parent’s employer plan even if they have an offer of coverage through their employer.



del.icio.us
Digg
Exactly the same way they made most of you people thing IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN were the same place run by the same people. GOOD LUCK!
Nothing in this new law keeps premiums from rising to account for new health plan costs or keeps physicians in a network if contracted payments fall too low.
Get ready for higher premiums, fewer businesses offering health insurance, and narrower networks of providers.
Folks, your costs are going up, a lot. This isn't even close to reality. But many believe anything The Obama says or that they hear on NBC...the rest of us make money on you fools ;)
They cannot deny health care because of pre-existing health issues and the un insured will get insurance.
Since I'm self employed I pay $1185.00 a month now for a family of three. I just received a letter for a renewal for the same coverage $1585.00. Now read this:Similarly, starting in plan year 2011, insurance companies that jack up rates will have to disclose requested premium increases publicly. If that rate increase is found to be unreasonable, the insurer may be prohibited from competing for your business in the new state-based exchange that will begin operating in 2014.
Okay so they'll jack o the price and blame health care reform? Give me a break. Health care cost was skyrocketing anyway.
That is why we need a single payer. Everyone pays their share and cost will go down. They scare people on government takeover bull.
1. Those generally very intelligent people in college who typically have become doctors do not choose different, more lucrative careers, thereby enabling 2nd & 3rd tier students to become doctors.
2. Big pharma and those doing medical research are not as greedy as they've been made out to be, because I kinda like all the new drugs and medical devices that have been invented, and I would like to see that continue.
Must have been written by the Democratic Party leadership
Enough Said.
thanks google for promoting this nonsense I guess we now know what your white house meeting with Obama was all about
Fewer Doctors w/more patients. This administration has very fuzzy math
They can't even understand it. How can we???
IF there aren't too many unforeseen circumstances (like young adults and/or businesses opting out to save money), and
IF congress enacts the cuts they say they will.
I hope the costs go down, but I just can't believe it. The CBO has been wrong, even very wrong, it its estimates before.
Insurance is a gamble. Like all gambling, the odds are suppose to be AGAINST YOU! If you are already sick, what person would bet that you won't get sick again? Health Care Insurance is a PRIVELAGE not a RIGHT.
So KACI you are saying Insurance companies are heartless? A business has employees, employees get paid when the business makes money. So you expect them to be moral, pay 1 million dollars to save a couple people's lives, and then take that 1 million away from its employees? So you save 5 lives and screw up 100 others? What is moral there? Is it moral to demand something for nothing?
I hate to tell you, but it is impossible to afford health insurance for everyone, especially the sickest people. Is it fair? NO, but life never was fair.
There may be a way to provide health care to more americans, which would be a good thing, but this is not a step in the right direction. This simply provides another way for people to take advantage of the system.
There's no reason why it can't be successful except for greed. Health is big business, the difference is in Canada an UK they don't try to cash in on it (at least not as much as the US).
UK is better than Canada because in the UK all medicines are $6 each regardless of what it is and the contraceptive pill is free. In Canada the medicine isn't automatically covered, you need separate insurance for that. In Canada for those without an insurance plan, you just get to see the doctor for free but you still die because you can't afford the medicine.
There's no reason why it can't be successful except for greed. Health is big business, the difference is in Canada an UK they don't try to cash in on it (at least not as much as the US).
UK is better than Canada because in the UK all medicines are $6 each regardless of what it is and the contraceptive pill is free. In Canada the medicine isn't automatically covered, you need separate insurance for that. In Canada for those without an insurance plan, you just get to see the doctor for free but you still die because you can't afford the medicine.
Doctors who don't take medicare are exercising their right. I know lots of other physicians who will take Medicare. (That's not to say that Medicare doesn't need a kick in the pants - it does).
It will change the incentives for insurance companies - make no mistake, they'll make their money because they're smart and will figure it out. But the most egregious behaviors of the companies are curbed by the law.
The rest of you, get a grip. The existing system wasn't sustainable. The things that doctors are crying about today wasn't going to change prior to the law being passed. They'd be fighting over an ever smaller pool of patients who have insurance because fewer and fewer people could afford the coverage.
People who're complaining today seem to have an agenda - it's either greed, malice or ignorance. Nothing that they're writing seems to have any facts behind it ... Let's see how the law is implemented before we pass judgement.
People who do not have insurance they goto emergency. Emergency room visit costs 1:50 ratio. Hence they charge more to folks with insurance.
My uncle do not have insurance, went to emergency, had a medical bill of 30k, he doesn't even read the letters came from hospitals. All that is charged to insurance. That burden won't be there any more.
Regarding increase in patient inflow, definetly quality of care would reduce. will get more doctors from other countries, my friend is indian, his two cousin doctors came to USA recently. that is not problem at all.
Finally republicans says why this bill mandates fine if insurance is not taken. Well my suggestion the bill can remove that mandate when right of treatment at emergency room for only people with insurance or pay your self.
ahhha you want free for visiting emergency room but not want to pay for insurance.....
Common, cut the Bull shit doctor. How much are you making a year, by overcharging our people. I bet,You've been able to pay your school debt in less than two years. Tell me about your monthly expenses, the luxury you're living in, because you're overcharging for your services, under the old health care laws.
Your wages should be limited by law, like the cops, the teachers, the firefighters income. You're not doing more school than many of the people with a master degree. Just stop complaining man.
Obama should bring in doctors from England, Germany, Japan, or any other developed country, you name it, and pay them just a bit more than what they're making home. It will be way less than what our country is paying for its doctors.
People are choosing this job here in USA, because is making you rich in a few years, and not because they like the job or care for the sick.
Many of you think they're some kind of gods. You treat your patients with arrogance and greed is your disease.
Mr.Dr.God shut the ...door!
Quit being a dr. and get a job.
I've got no weekend for many years too. You're not the only one that has to sacrifice time and family time.
You're old, but not so smart it seems.
Or you believe that us, the"not Doctors people" are some kind of stupid animals, right?
Do you know the difference between a cardiologist and God?
God doesn't think he's a cardiologist!
Man you've made me mad! I hope you're retired, cause you need it! After all this life of a leech, on our backs, sucking the vigor out of this people.
Health care is for all, and it should be free for every American!
When was the last time you considered spending countless hours studying your ass off to GET INTO medical school let alone make it out of there alive???
Hey by the way Cornel, MAYBE 10% of the cost of surgery ACTUALLY goes to the freaking surgeon. And the way things have been lately, less probably makes it even near the doctor.
Then pricks like you have the nerve to say my back hurts and SUE a doctor that did nothing but good for you.
If being a Doctor is SO DAMNED easy, why aren't you a doctor? Clearly, it doesn't matter how much debt you get in at the start. Clearly, the doctors haven't worked hard, and don't deserve anything but a 40,000$ a year salary.
MAN YOU'VE MADE ME MAD! Have you ever had to worry about someone suing you for your house and home, just because their arm (that you perfectly operated on) didn't heal properly?
What seems freaking appealing at the IDEA of going to college for 6 or 7 years studying your ass off, spending 4 or 5 in residency (making LESS than minimum wage, working 70-80 hours a week), and then finally come into practice (still working 60 or more hours a week) after being in 200,000$ in debt? O, and don't forget about malpractice insurance.... you are right, doctors did get paid well.. if they didn't who would want to be a freakin doctor? I know who! a run of the mill IDIOT that can't tell the difference between a muscle and a ligament. THAT would be a surgeon I could trust. Smarter people will find different fields that pay better than doctors with less stress.
The health care in Canada? in UK? The one good thing they have done is lower the cost of medications, which are overpriced. But to get help in Canada you may be put on a waitlist for months. Not only that, Why are their better doctors in America if their healthcare systems are so much better???
The life expectancy is 50th because people gorge massive amounts of food and their arteries get clogged. GO FIGURE you can afford more food when your country is "rich".
I would be more sympathetic towards you if maybe you showed the slightest sign of sympathy to anyone else but yourself. Calling doctors and everyone else greedy? You are the one's asking for money, that you have done no work to receive. Moreover, I wouldn't be surprised if you were living from paycheck to paycheck, and instead of buying a health insurance plan, you go on a 7 day cruise.
* Aetna, Ronald A. Williams: $24,300,112
* Cigna, H. Edward Hanway: $12,236,740
* Coventry, Dale Wolf: $9,047,469
* Health Net, Jay Gellert: $4,425,355
* Humana, Michael McCallister: $4,764,309
* U. Health Group, Stephen J. Hemsley: $3,241,042
* Wellpoint, Angela Braly: $9,844,212
Post your comment