Home | Non-food | Healthcare | Minnesota Boy Now Cancer Free

Minnesota Boy Now Cancer Free

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

By Rachel Stockton

Daniel Hauser, the 13-yr old boy who fled from his hometown of Sleepy Eye, Minnesota to avoid conventional cancer treatments, completed his last round of radiation on November 6.

Hauser’s case garnered national attention last year when he made the decision, which he said was due to his religious beliefs, to stop the treatment after the first round.  He was diagnosed last January with Hodgkin’s lymphoma.  As the tumor began to grow rapaciously, it began to crowd and put pressure on many of Daniel’s vital organs.

According to reports, he and his mother found an alternative remedy online that they wanted to try, to the exclusion of traditional treatment altogether. A medical neglect petition was subsequently filed in Brown County District Court; the judge took custody from Daniel’s parents.

Daniel and his mother, Colleen went on the lam in May; they returned several weeks later, promising to abide by the prescribed treatment protocol.  The case became a rallying point for those who believe the Hausers had the right to decide what treatment they wanted their son to have.

Although most states allow parents to refuse treatment based on religious beliefs, Minnesota removed a similar provision twenty years ago.

Daniel’s parents asked the court to remove the court order back in October, since they were in compliance with their physician’s recommendations.  However, the court order is still in place, and will be until a final report has been submitted by Family Services.

Immediately upon his return to Minnesota, Daniel began his dreaded chemo treatments, which ended in early September.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted):

sandal on 11/09/2009 10:47:48
avatar
the treatment itself often causes later death from secondary cancers and other treatment-related diseases. And along the way, the treatment will enter the books as a success because the patient survived for just five years. Someone who dies of pneumonia, because his or her immune system was destroyed by chemotherapy, for example, is generally not counted as a “cancer” death. Likewise, someone whose liver is destroyed by chemo, and dies of liver disease, is also not counted as a cancer death. Cancer mortality as a result of treatment is grossly understated because the cause of death is taken from a death certificate. The direct cause of death may have been liver failure, but the liver failure was caused by the treatment. Because of the way deaths are recorded, it makes “cure” rates look far better than they actually are.
Whatever happens, this boy and his family have suffered a violation of human rights. Just because the majority of the world doesn't view health and death the way they do, doesn't make them wrong.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Newsletter
Email:
Tags
No tags for this article

Rate this article
0