- Nutrition
- Avoiding Illness
- Safety
- Environment
- Food Chemicals
- Cooking & Dining
- Shopping
- Sci-Tech
- Politics
- Opinion
- Non-food
- Watch-List
New FDA tobacco regulations will have a public health impact by prohibiting the use of misleading descriptors that, in the past, have decreased smokers’ motivation to quit.
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, signed into law in 2009, prohibits the use of the terms "light," "low," "mild," and other similar descriptors in tobacco product labels or advertising.
Starting June 22, 2010, the law prohibits manufacturers from producing any tobacco products labeled or advertised as "light," "low," "mild," or any other similar descriptor. However, manufacturers are permitted to distribute existing products until July 21.
On July 22, 2010, the law prohibits the tobacco industry from distributing or introducing into the U.S. market any tobacco products for which the labeling or advertising contains the descriptors "light," "low," "mild," or any similar descriptor, irrespective of the date of manufacture. However, consumers may continue to see some products with these descriptors for sale in stores after July 22 because retailers are permitted to sell off their inventory.
Cigarettes labeled "light," "low," or "mild" are often called "low-yield" because they deliver less than 15 mg of tar when measured on a standardized smoking machine. Starting in the 1960s (after a 1964 historic Surgeon General’s report on smoking and health), cigarette manufacturers made changes in cigarette design to achieve and promote low-yield cigarettes. Design changes included adding different size and density filters, ventilation holes to dilute the smoke measured, and chemical additives in the paper and/or tobacco. Advertisements implied that the low-yield cigarettes (i.e., those labeled "light," "low," or "mild") were safer than regular cigarettes.
However, there is no convincing scientific evidence to indicate that low-yield cigarettes are safe. No cigarette design changes have resulted in a decrease in the diseases caused by smoking.
In response to the new law, some manufacturers have switched to color-coded packaging to market cigarettes formerly labeled "light," "low," or "mild." For example, one manufacturer is using lighter-colored packaging to represent the former "light" brand, and another is using the term "gold" to replace the term "light."
Prohibiting the use of terms like "light," "low," and "mild" is an important step to help protect the public health. Many smokers mistakenly believe that cigarettes marketed with these descriptors cause fewer health problems than other cigarettes. Removing "light," "low," "mild," and other similar descriptors will help ensure that tobacco product labels and advertising are not misleading.
Although many smokers believe that these products are less harmful, studies have found that:
Each year, an estimated 443,000 people die prematurely from smoking or exposure to secondhand smoke, and another 8.6 million live with a serious illness caused by smoking.
All cigarettes are harmful to your health—regardless of their taste, smell, label, or packaging color. There is no such thing as a safe cigarette.
Millions of former smokers have successfully quit. In fact, today there are more former smokers than smokers. For help, visit www.smokefree.gov
or call 1-800-QUIT-NOW (1-800-784-8669; TTY 1-800-332-8615).
del.icio.us |
Digg




How many lives have been lost and could have been saved if the campaign utilized both the anti smoking message at the same time encouraging those that do choose to smoke to at least use those products that cause minimal damage. The anti smoking lobby are playing God with no real scrutiny of their recommendations nor consequence it would appear for the deaths that could have been avoided.
i know theres the same amount of chemical additives,but surely there is less tar and nicotine absorbed in the 1mg one?it hurts my throat bad to smoke the stronger cigs hence smoking thing the b&h "Ultimates"-1mg.im not ready to give up totally yet(ive smoked for 6 years)
Post your comment