Babies who consume fish early in life have a lower risk of wheezing
By David Liu and editing by Stacey Sexton
A study in the Dec. 2011 issue of Acta Paediatrica suggests that eating fish before nine months of age cuts the risk of wheezing, particularly recurrent wheezing and multiple-trigger wheezing, while the wheezing risk was higher among babies who used antibiotics in the first week of life or whose mothers used pre-natal paracetamol.
The study, led by Emma Goksör of Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden and colleagues, shows that babies who ate fish before the age of 9 months had a 40 percent reduced risk for recurrent wheezing. Conversely, using broad-spectrum antibiotics in the first week of life doubled the risk for recurrent wheezing up to 4.5 years of age and almost tripled the risk for multiple-trigger wheezing.
The study was based on data from a cohort of children born in western Sweden. Parents answered questionnaires at 9 months, 12 months and 4.5 years of age.
The fish commonly consumed by babies, according to a press release by the journal, includes white fish (79%), followed by salmon/game fish (17%), flat fish (3%) and herring/mackerel.
The researchers previously reported that fish, which is thought to reduce allergy risks, also helps fight eczema in infancy and allergic rhinitis at pre-school age. Other research has suggested a protective effect against asthma.
A broad-spectrum antibiotic refers to an antibiotic that can kill a wide range of pathogenic bacteria. Commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics include amoxicillin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin.
(Send your news to email@example.com, Foodconsumer.org is part of the Infoplus.com ™ news and information network)
- This "Invisible Food" Contains Hidden Allergens (And Can Sabotage Your Health)
- Do statins increase and Mediterranean diet decrease the risk of breast cancer?
- Climate: Meat turns up the heat
- Melatonin reduces oxidative stress in traumatic brain
- Monsanto Latte?
Rate this article