Home | Safety | Chemical | EPA wants less fluoride in water, but do we need any of the chemical?

EPA wants less fluoride in water, but do we need any of the chemical?

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

David Liu and editing by Denise Reynolds

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  jointly announced on Jan 7 their new recommendations on water fluoridation.
 
The U.S. government now recommends that the fluoridation should be carried out at 0.7 milligrams of fluoride per liter instead of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams of fluoride per liter as recommended in the past.
 
Water fluoridation, according to American Dental Association and U.S., state, and local governments, helps prevent dental caries (tooth decay). Ironically, exposure to high levels of fluoride is a cause of fluorosis, a streaking or spotting of the teeth.
 
In a joint press release, HHS and EPA said the new recommendation came after The National Academy of Science reviewed and found evidence based on which the health agencies can balance the benefits and unwanted health effects from fluoride in drinking water.
 
According to Fluoride Action Network, exposure to excessive levels of fluoride has been associated with incidents of allergies, arthritis, bone disease, brain function, cancer, dental fluorosis, gastrointestinal problems, problems with immune system, kidney problems, respiratory and reproductive problems, and tooth decay among other things. Just recently, a study in China has shown exposure to fluoride lowers children's IQ.
 
The new rule will not take effect immediately. There will be a period of 30 days for the public and others to input comments and then the government will finalize the new recommendation.
 
Water fluoridation is controversial. Opponents say the government, pushed by dental associations, has no right to force citizens to drink water fluoridated as fluoride is a known toxin and medicine. They say if there is any benefit from this harmful yet useless mineral, people can always take fluoride supplements.

Dr. Paul Connet, Ph.D. of St. Lawrence University in Canton, NY published an article on April 12, 2004 on the website of fluoridealert.org saying there are 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation.

  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Newsletter
Email:

Rate this article
0