foodconsumer.org: Which is better at preventing stroke, Stenting or Surgery? Which is better at preventing stroke, Stenting or Surgery? ================================================================================ admin on 03/01/2010 01:30:00 A new study led by researchers at Oregon Health & Science University suggests that the stenting procedure is as effective and safe as surgery if not better for preventing stroke in high risk patients. The study of 2,502 patients in more than 100 U.S. and Canadian Hospitals showed there was a slight difference between the two procedures in the risk of stroke and heart attack in the first fours weeks after the treatment. However, Wayne Clark and colleagues, authors of the study, found during the first 2.5 years after the treatment, the risk for stroke, heart attack and death was found the same in both groups, 2 % vs 2.4 %, which was not statistically significantly different. The findings were presented on Sunday at the American Stroke Association's (ASA) International Stroke Conference. Not all studies are consistent. One study presented at the same conference resulted in contradictory results. Another recent study conducted by Robbs J.V. and colleagues from University of KwaZulu-Natal in Durban, South Africa showed that patients who received carotid endarterectomy were more likely to suffer disabling stroke, stroke and death. The study published in the Nov-Dec 2009 issue of Cardiovascular Journal of Africa involved 440 patients of whom 177 had carotid artery stenting and 263 endarterectomy between Jan 2005 and Dec 2008. Like other studies, many factors including patients' health statuses, stents used in the study and surgeons' skills among other things may all affect the study results. In this South Africa study, doctors decided the treatment option for each patient based on many medical parameters including internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, intraluminal thrombus, ICA tortuosity, gross surface ulceration of plaque and excessive calcification. So there was some bias. Clark said the European study came to a different conclusion because the patients had severer health conditions, the stents used differed from those used in the U.S. study and surgeons were not as skillful as those in the U.S. study. The point is that it is very difficult to compare stenting with surgery to tell which procedure is better than the other. Luckily, stroke is not something that food consumers can't do to prevent. Like other cardiovascular problems, stroke can be prevented by following a healthy lifestyle including a healthy diet. Numerous studies have been conducted and evidence has emerged to suggest that many foods or nutrients can help cut the risk including vitamin E, B3 niacin, potassium, calcium, fiber, vitamin C and vegetables, and fish oils, vitamin D sufficiency, and vegan diet among other things. On the other hand, the (potential) risk factors for stroke include high salt intake, fast food with high fat and high trans fat, radiation used in medical diagnostics and treatment, certain dairy foods, smoking, certain bacterial infections, anger, possibly cough medicine, high intake of folic acid, anti-psychotic drugs, antidepressants, and painkillers. An estimated 700,000 cases of stroke are recorded each year in the United States and 150,000 people can't survive the cardiovascular event. For your information, stroke symptoms according to webmd.com include sudden numbness, paralysis, or weakness particularly on only one side of the body, difficult walking or balancing, sudden vision changes, drooling or slurred speech and problems speaking, understanding simple statements or feeling confused and severe headache. If you experience any of these symptoms, seek medical attention immediately. By David Liu