<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<title>foodconsumer.org</title>
	<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Salt Institute: New dietary guidelines on sodium will increase obesity and health risks for Americans (PR)</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Nutrition/dietary_guidelines_on_sodium_0807100638.html</link>
							<category>Nutrition</category>
							<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>Editor&amp;#039; note: We can help publish your press release for free here.  Send it to foodconsumer.org@gmail.com. </description>
							
						
					</item>
					
							
								
									<item>
										<title>Riley</title>
										
										<category>Nutrition</category>
										<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>This is absurd. The science behind the health benefits of 1500mg/da of sodium is unassailable and not in doubt. The Salt Institute claims are pseudo-science, junk science, and another reason to look skeptically at any industry funded &amp;quot;science&amp;quot; claim. They&amp;#039;re in it for the money, not our health.</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>Michael Bulger</title>
										
										<category>Nutrition</category>
										<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>The negative health consequences you cite occur at sodium levels WELL BELOW what is being recommended by the USDA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I glanced at the abstract a study you cite. What you describe as a low-sodium regime might more accurately be depicted as an salt deprivation. The study found risks occurring at &amp;lt;20mmol/d. The new recommendations would be well above that at closer to 70mmol/d. You should reevaluate your use of the study as evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to your assumption that humans have an innate taste for salty snacks and would not possibly be satisfied by lower-salt options, you once again seem to be facing evidence to the contrary. From the DGAC report: &amp;quot;Taste preference for sodium is neither fixed nor innate. Rather, it is a malleable trait that is influenced by dietary exposure. At birth, there is no indication that salty substances are distinguishable or preferred (Beauchamp, 1986). &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Studies have demonstrated that reducing dietary sodium intake over a time period of as little as 3 to 4 weeks can decrease preference for salty foods and increase acceptance of foods with reduced sodium content (Bertino, 1982;; Cooper and Sanger, 1984).&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To put it simply, the less salt we eat, the less we care for it. This, I am sure, does not seem good for your business. Think instead of the lives saved and the extended lives (and therefore ability to purchase products) that will result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you insist on heaping praise upon salt, please do not insult the public by trying to pass off studies of salt deprivation as evidence that current levels are beneficial.</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>Kathleen Blanchard</title>
										
											<link>http://http://www.emaxhealth.com</link>
										
										<category>Nutrition</category>
										<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>Michael left the exact same comment at our website when we published the Salt Institute&amp;#039;s response. Not sure why the Salt Institute isn&amp;#039;t contacted directly, or why anyone assumes the press release is the website&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;praise&amp;quot; or opinion...</description>
									</item>
								
							
						
				
			
		
	
	
	
	
<description>foodconsumer.org</description>
</channel>
</rss>
