<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<title>foodconsumer.org</title>
	<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Plum Organics issues voluntary recall on baby food product</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Shopping/Alerts/plum_organics_issues_voluntary_recall_on_baby_food_product_20102.html</link>
							<category>Alerts</category>
							<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>By Sheilah Downey California-based baby food company Plum Organics issued a voluntary recall today of one of its products due to a threat of botulism, </description>
							
						
					</item>
					
							
								
									<item>
										<title>SB</title>
										
										<category>Alerts</category>
										<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>This pouch is not frozen, it&amp;#039;s on the shelves.  That is why there is a risk.  Consumers have to ask themselves why they would feed their children food from a pouch left on a shelf for a year or more.  How much nutrition can possibly be left, and what risks it may pose.  Crazy!</description>
									</item>
								
							
						
				
			
		
	
	
	
	
<description>foodconsumer.org</description>
</channel>
</rss>
