<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<title>foodconsumer.org</title>
	<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						
							<title>U.S. public overwhelmingly rejects genetically engineered trees</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/gm_trees_0504130614.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>NOTE:&amp;nbsp;You can join the protests against genetically engineered trees at Tree Biotech 2013:http://www.treebiotech2013.org/And check out:http://globaljusticeecology.org/stopgetrees.php------U.S. public overwhelmingly rejects genetically engineered treesGlobal Justice Ecology Project, April </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>GE Trees May Be Even More Damaging to the Environment than GE Foods</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/ge_trees_0427130542.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>Story at-a-glance

The documentary A Silent Forest: The Growing Threat, Genetically Engineered Trees discusses how genetically engineered (GE) trees may adversely impact ecological systems on a </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Air pollution bad for type 2 diabetes patients</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/air_pollution_tyoe_2_diabetes_0424130717.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>By Jimmy Downs

Wednesday April 24, 2013 (foodconsumer.org) -- A new study in Diabetes Care suggests exposure to outdoor air pollution may increase the risk of </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Today’s Smorgasbord of Ag Chemicals Poses Special Risks to Children’s Health</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/ag_chemicals_0326131241.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>By Dr. Mercola

It can no longer be denied that environmental chemicals are having a significant impact on human health, and that impact even starts while </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>BPA boosts risk of childhood asthma</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/bpa_children_asthma_0303130653.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>Jimmy Downs

Sunday March 3, 2013 (foodconsumer.org) -- Bisphenol A or BPA, which is commonly used in transparent hard plastic, &amp;nbsp;may increase risk of another medical </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster: What can you do to protect yourself?</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/fukushima_daiichi_nuclear_disaster_0228131027.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>By David Liu, PHD

Thursday Feb 28, 2013 (foodconsumer.org) -- The 2011 nuclear disaster in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan or simply called </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Using mobile phones lowers odds of survival from brain cancer - study</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/mobile_phones_lowers_odds_of_survival_from_brain_cancer_02111309.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>By David Liu, PHD

Monday Feb 11, 2013 (foodconsumer.org) -- Dr. L. Hardell from University Hospital in &amp;Ouml;rebro, Sweden, probably the one and only brilliant epidemiologist </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Bye-Bye to the Airport TSA Backscatter Machines</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/backscatter_machines_0105131133.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>Editor&amp;#039;s comment:  When a non-x-ray based scanner is available, why should the x-ray based machine Rapiscan backscatter screening machines be used along with the non-ray based machine?  We all know that x-ray is a cancer-causing agent, which is officially recognized by the U.S. National Toxicology Porgram.  Why should U.S. men and women and children should subject themselves to such a risk?</description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>hormone disruptors and carcinogens</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/hormone_disruptors_and_carcinogens_0105130743.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>Dear Readers,

Do you think the government is protecting us from harmful chemicals in personal care products?

It's not.

Right now, cosmetics companies can put almost any ingredient </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Counting the cost of mercury pollution - PR</title>
							<link>http://www.foodconsumer.org/newsite/Non-food/Environment/mercury_pollution_0107130653.html</link>
							
										
								
							<category>Environment</category>
							<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>Contact: Hilary Gloverhilary.glover@biomedcentral.com44-020-319-22370BioMed Central&amp;nbsp;
Counting the cost of mercury pollution
















&amp;nbsp;IMAGE:&amp;nbsp;New estimates suggest that between 1.5 and 2 million children in the EU are born each year </description>
							
						
					</item>
				
			
		
<description>foodconsumer.org</description>
</channel>
</rss>