> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.foodconsumer.org/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Mistletoe extract helps cancer survival
- URL: https://www.foodconsumer.org/mistletoe_extract_helps_cancer_survival_2012090632/
- Published: 2009-12-20T18:31:00.000Z
- Updated: 2026-09-22T18:37:53.000Z
- Description: A systematic review in BMC Cancer pooled 41 studies of the mistletoe extract Iscador and put the overall hazard ratio for survival at 0.59. The authors flag considerable publication bias, and randomised studies showed weaker effects than non-randomised ones.
- Author: Food Consumer
- Tags: Phytochemicals, Nutrition, #vivvo-import

Research article

# Survival of cancer patients treated with mistletoe extract (Iscador): a systematic literature review 

**Thomas Ostermann** [](http://www.biomedcentral.com/logon/logon.asp?msg=ce&ref=foodconsumer.org), **Christa Raak** [](http://www.biomedcentral.com/logon/logon.asp?msg=ce&ref=foodconsumer.org) and **Arndt Bussing** [](http://www.biomedcentral.com/logon/logon.asp?msg=ce&ref=foodconsumer.org)

*BMC Cancer* 2009, **9** **:**451doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-451

| Published: | 18 December 2009 |
| ---------- | ---------------- |

### Abstract (provisional)

#### Background

In Europe, extracts from Viscum album (VA-E), the European white-berry mistletoe, are widely used to treat patients with cancer. 

#### Methods

We searched several databases such as Cochrane, EMBASE, NCCAM, NLM, DIMDI, CAMbase, and Medline. Inclusion criteria were controlled clinical studies on parameters associated with survival in cancer patients treated with Iscador. Outcome data were extracted as they were given in the publication, and converted into standardized mean differences and their standard errors using standard formulas.

#### Results

We found 49 publications on the clinical effects of Iscador usage on survival of cancer patients which met our criteria. Among them, 41 studies and strata provided enough data to extract hazard ratios (HR) and their standard errors (Iscador versus no extra treatment). The majority of studies reported positive effects in favor of the Iscador application. Heterogeneity of study results was moderate (I^2=38.3%, p<0.0001). The funnel plots were considerably skewed, indicating a publication bias, a notion which is corroborated by statistical means (AC=-1.3, CI: -1.9 to -0.6, p<=0.0001). A random effect meta-analysis estimated the overall hazard ratio at HR=0.59 (CI: 0.53 to 0.66, p<0.0001). Randomized studies showed less effects than non-randomized studies (ratio of HRs: 1.24, CI: 0.79 to 1.92, p=0.35), and matched-pair studies gave significantly better results than others (ratio of HRs: 0.33; CI: 0.17 to 0.65, p=0.0012).

#### Conclusions

Pooled analysis of clinical studies suggests that adjuvant treatment of cancer patients with the mistletoe extract Iscador is associated with a better survival. Despite obvious limitations, and strong hints for a publication bias which limits the evidence found in this meta-analysis, one can not ignore the fact that studies with positive effects of VA-E on survival of cancer patients are accumulating. Future studies evaluating the effects of Iscador should focus on a transparent design and description of endpoints in order to provide greater insight into a treatment often being depreciated as ineffective, but highly valued by cancer patients. 

Originally published on

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/451/abstract