> ## Content Index > Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.foodconsumer.org/llms.txt > Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further. # One bad apple… - URL: https://www.foodconsumer.org/one_bad_apple_0215150730/ - Published: 2015-02-15T08:27:00.000Z - Updated: 2026-09-22T15:51:12.000Z - Description: USDA approved the genetically engineered 'Arctic' apple, which does not brown when sliced. Critics warn that masking browning could hide spoilage in a product already prone to recalls, that FDA does no independent pre-market safety testing, and that the apples would carry no mandatory label. - Author: Food Consumer - Tags: Politics, #vivvo-import [](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=eSFxedP18Gx1ITrx0tOdeQY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) | Despite public opposition, USDA has just approved the genetically engineered (GE) “Arctic” apple.1 [Tell food companies to reject this risky new product >>](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=fyuSVY%2FKqpjYIIQQc%2FROGgY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | After decades of promises from the biotech industry that genetically engineered (GE) food would feed the world, cure the sick, reduce agricultural dependence on toxic chemicals, and save countless crops from imminent collapse, **USDA has just approved** a product they think will solve a problem humans have struggled with for centuries… **an apple that doesn’t brown when you slice it… Seriously**; we couldn’t make this stuff up. While these GE apples are a waste of time and money, we don’t want to downplay the real concerns about them. Pre-sliced apples are already a frequently recalled food product. Once the whole fruit is sliced, it has an increased risk of exposure to pathogens. **Since** **browning is a sign that apples are no longer fresh, “masking” this natural signal could lead people to consume contaminated apples**, which is why some folks are calling it **the “botox apple.”** Further, since FDA does no independent, pre-market safety testing of GE food there are several unanswered questions about the safety of GE apples. “Silencing” the genes that make apples turn brown when exposed to oxygen could have unintended consequences that will only be tested by hungry consumers. Although these “botox apples” are primarily targeted to the fresh-sliced apple market **they could also find their way into non-GE juice, baby foods, or apple sauce at the processing level - all products predominantly eaten by children and babies** who are at increased risk for any adverse health effects. [**Tell food companies parents do not want to feed their kids GE apples!**](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=X44E5S5WAI%2FQYDqgE3s2UAY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) Like other GE products in the U.S., **no mandatory labeling would be required.**While Okanagan (the manufacturer) says they’ll require growers to label their whole apples as “Arctic variety,” the government has announced no plans to require labeling of these apples as GE. If approved, Okanagan’s non-browning “Arctic” apple would be first commercialized in Granny Smith and Golden Delicious varieties, with Fuji and Gala on the horizon. **Even the apple industry has opposed this genetically engineered product.** The U.S. Apple Association, Northwest Horticultural Council (which represents Washington apple growers, who grow over 60% of the apples in the U.S.), British Columbia Fruit Growers Association and other grower groups have already voiced their disapproval of these GE apples due to the negative impact they could have on farmers growing organic and non-GE apples through contamination, and to the image of the apple industry as a whole. **McDonald’s and Gerber have already indicated that they don’t plan to use these GE apples.** **If the apple industry doesn’t want GE apples, and consumers don’t want GE apples, who do these apples really benefit?** As usual, this product only benefits**the biotech industry and big food** processing companies. [**Sign the petition urging food companies to reject GE apples!** ](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=KOp0AHE8eSAGg9v%2BG2l1UgY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) We’ll send your signatures along with a letter to the top fast food restaurants, supermarkets and food companies to secure commitments from them that they will not sell or use this risky new product. Thanks for everything you do, Center for Food Safety \-------------------------------------------------- \[1\] CFS Press Release (2/13/15) [*USDA Approves Genetically Engineered Apple Despite Health Concerns*](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=B%2BI3%2BxvoKQIy83SDOItVqwY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | **Contact Us** CFS welcomes your questions and comments. Please contact us at [office@centerforfoodsafety.org](mailto:office@centerforfoodsafety.org), or at one of our offices. [DONATE](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=TgfjKHamqhfgfx5rFxB3IwY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) | | National Headquarters660 Pennsylvania Ave, SE, #302Washington, DC 20003phone [(202) 547-9359](tel:%28202%29%20547-9359) \| fax[(202) 547-9429](tel:%28202%29%20547-9429) [www.centerforfoodsafety.org](http://salsa3.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=%2FaAgGATCU6118EDnezYL%2BgY2KPv1neKU&ref=foodconsumer.org) | |