ESSAY OF THE WEEK

Seeds of Revolution

Dr. Vandana Shiva’s work around seed sovereignty and organic agriculture is perhaps best known in India. But she influences and inspires on a global scale.

With special thanks to, and permission fromAcres U.S.A., North America’s monthly magazine of ecological agriculture, we reprint the following introduction and in-depth interview with Dr. Shiva.

Americans who visit India often come back more or less overwhelmed by its vast size and complexity, and if they are not stunned into silence they are at least much less willing to engage in generalities. Timeless beauty, explosive economic growth, persistent poverty and about a billion people all make for an intense experience if you’re used to the predictable movements of cars and shoppers.

One thing that does emerge from the ancient nation’s recent history, though, is the way societies that seem chaotic and disorganized to outsiders actually offer opportunities for their citizens who are willing to act with boldness, imagination and fierce resolve.

Gandhi was one such actor, and Vandana Shiva may well be another. Increasingly well-known here as an author and lecturer, her popularity makes her a pain in the neck to proponents of industrial agriculture.

Read the Acres U.S.A. interview with Vandana Shiva

ACTION ALERT

Call the Doctor!

If you’re one of the nearly 12 million people who visit WebMD.com every month, you’re getting a healthy dose of Monsanto propaganda along with your “health research.”Monsanto is one of the many corporate “sponsors” of WebMD. That means Monsanto pays WebMD in order to pepper WebMD’s website with advertisements and advertorials, disguised as legitimate journalism.

WebMD Health Corp. (NASDAQ: WBMD) is a publicly held corporation that answers first and foremost to its shareholders. The company, with its long history of deceiving consumers and partnering up with drug, junk food and biotech companies, is not, and never was, in the business of caring about consumers—a fact meticulously documented in an article published this week (January 19, 2016) by Mercola.com.

Why bother to ask one corrupt corporation, WebMD, to cut ties with another, equally or exceedingly corrupt corporation (Monsanto)?

Because Monsanto’s WebMD propaganda is cleverly disguised as legitimate health advice. So cleverly, that millions of visitors to the site probably have no idea that they’re being duped.

TAKE ACTION: Tell WebMD CEO David Schlanger to Stop Promoting Monsanto!

More on WebMD’s collusion with Monsanto and Big Pharma

Text “WebMD” to 97779 to join OCA’s mobile network and take action!

Tweet it now!

ACTION ALERT

Welcome to Democracy

After four state ballot initiatives, the introduction of more than 30 state bills (some dead, some still in play), and a federal bill (passed by the House but languishing in limbo), the GMO labeling issue could end up being decided during top secret negotiations, between Monsanto’s minions and labeling advocates, behind closed doors in Washington D.C.Welcome to democracy.

As we reported last week, on January 13 (2016), USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack met with five representatives of the Grocery Manufacturers Association and Monsanto (the folks who oppose mandatory GMO labeling laws), and five representatives from the GMO labeling movement.

The meeting was “invitation only,” and participants were sworn to secrecy about what went down. All that was said publicly was “We’re still working out a compromise.”

We’ve heard our share of rumors, including a number of “compromises” that we find unacceptable. Like a mandatory QR code labeling scheme, that would not only preempt Vermont's law, but also make it illegal for companies like Campbell's to print on-package GMO labels.

Yesterday, PoliticoPro reported that all meeting-goers were still “mum” on the negotiations:

However, it does appear some information has been provided to members of the Senate Agriculture Committee. Chairman Pat Roberts said he knew the sides were meeting again this week, while Sen. John Hoeven, who is working on a GMO labeling bill, said he has heard from the agency about the first session, "but nothing I can be talking about publicly."

"We are trying to get people to come together and we are not there yet," Hoeven told MA, though he added that he is optimistic that an agreement can be reached.

Optimistic? That our side will go along with any scheme that preempts Vermont, unless it’s as strong, or stronger than Vermont’s law? Not if we have anything to say about it. Let’s keep raising our voices!

URGENT! TAKE ACTION: Tell USDA Sec. Tom Vilsack to back off and let Vermont’s GMO Labeling Law take effect!

Text "Back off" to 97779 to join OCA's mobile network and take action!

Tweet it now!

SUPPORT THE OCA & OCF

Evolution Revolution

"For this reason, the salvation of this human world lies nowhere else than in the human heart, in the human power to reflect, in human meekness and in human responsibility.Without a global revolution in the sphere of human consciousness, nothing will change for the better in the sphere of our being as humans, and the catastrophe toward which this world is headed—be it ecological, social, demographic or a general breakdown of civilization—will be unavoidable." – Vaclav Havel, then president of Czechoslovakia, in his February 1990 address to CongressOne of our partners in the Regeneration Revolution posted the above quote on Facebook this week. We had to share. Because it’s as relevant today as it was then.Through OCA, and through our new project, Regeneration International, we devote countless hours and ample resources to things like policy change, education, marketplace campaigns, research on organic regenerative farming practices, and training for farmers who want to convert to those practices.It’s important, nuts-and-bolts type work, requiring patience, determination, cooperation and specialized skills.But without “a global revolution in the sphere of human consciousness,” indeed, nothing will change for the better.Thank you for providing not only the financial support, but the motivation and conscience without which our work would be, well, just work. Your continued support will help fuel not just a Regeneration Revolution, but the “revolution in consciousness” that we will need for a true, global transformation.

Donate to the Organic Consumers Association (tax-deductible, helps support our work on behalf of organic standards, fair trade and public education)

Donate to the Organic Consumers Fund (non-tax-deductible, but necessary for our GMO labeling legislative efforts)

VIDEO OF THE WEEK

Home on the Range

Ranchers often get a bad rap. Every week there’s another story about how ranchers are climate villains. The recent headline-making standoff in Oregon hasn’t done anything to improve their image, either.

First of all, we reject the notion that all ranchers (and meat consumers) are part of the global warming problem. Many ranchers are dedicated climate-fixers, intentionally or otherwise, because they employ holistic management practices that actually repair soil and grasslands, turning them into natural carbon sinks. (Visit the Savory Institute website for more on how ranchers can be key players in cooling the planet. In fact, we desperately need their help).

As our national director, Ronnie Cummins, wrote recently:

North American cattle ranchers, for the most part, have no love for Cargill, Tyson, Monsanto, JBS, Smithfield, Elanco (animal drugs) or McDonald’s. Most of these ranchers practice traditional animal husbandry, conscientiously taking care of their animals from birth. They graze their cattle free-range on grass, as nature intended, before they’re forced to sell these heretofore-healthy animals at rock-bottom prices to the monopolistic meat cartel.

The conscientious rancher in our video this week shares the history of his family’s ranch, and the lengths he’s gone to repair his land and turn it into a healthy, biodiverse landscape—all while raising animals.

Watch the video

Why Vegetarians, Ranchers and Conscious Omnivores Need to Unite

NEW REPORT

Steeped in Toxics

Who doesn’t love a nice cup of hot tea on a cold winter day?Anyone who’s read the latest report from Beyond Pesticides, on how tea imported to the U.S. is often full of pesticide residues. We’re talking residues from pesticides that are banned in the U.S., despite our already lax regulations.

From the report:

In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) consistently finds high levels of illegal residues on imported tea that eventually finds its way to the American consumer. This includes permethrin (a synthetic pyrethroid, linked to cancer and endocrine system disruption), DDE (a metabolite of DDT, banned in the U.S. in 1972), heptachlor epoxide (a derivative of the pesticide heptachlor, which was banned in the U.S. for use in agriculture and as a termiticide due to its carcinogenicity and persistence in the environment),4 and acetamiprid (a bee-toxic neonicotinoid).

Why don’t we reject these tea imports, if they violate regulations? It seems that the FDA now tests less than one-tenth of one percent of all imported foods (yes,foods, not just tea)!

How best to avoid contaminated teas? Choose certified organic, according to the report.

Read the report

LITTLE BYTES

Essential Reading for the Week

Mercury Fillings: ADA Attacked for Mercury Denialism

Our GMO Rules Need Fixing, Mr. President

Anger and Scrutiny Grow over Poisoned Water in Michigan City

As Bees Die off, the EPA Shuffles Its Feet

TTIP: The Downfall of European Agriculture?

8 Poison-Free Ways to Get Rid of Mice